When that occurs confidence in the product escalates leaving little room for argument. The end result for me is that the numbers must reflect a true result, offer little room for user error and show accountability. This effectively shows a company’s business position in terms of financial health swiftly and it cannot easily be ignored. Paid versions of accounting software are already doing this in their reporting. I do think that the reporting can do with some fine tuning and deliver graphical reports. This is not readily found in other similar paid products and their support.
Probably one of the greatest benefits of Manager is its team who listen and then deliver in a way to address the issue / request. The application’s scalability is good from the testing I have done. Something not to be taken lightly is Manager’s ability to look identical on any operating system platform, accessible from any device while delivering great performance.
So to be fair Manager has some way to go. Many of the features requested, for example the scan to file and upload of documents etc are already found in paid web based accounting applications. Of course there is the vision that Manager will reach the point of maturity in an accurate and timely fashion. I think we understand the reason for the rapid change and it is largely driven by user feature requests and demand. This can be disconcerting when compared to similar paid software. Manager has a draw back and it is in this that its functionality and features are changing rapidly. Managers simplicity is great but like any piece of software once you know where to do what, it will function as you would expect.
I am a business person and this is my view on only some points.
0 kommentar(er)
